Poison ivy is native to North Carolina. It will grow in floodplain wetlands and swamps, but also grows in drier upland areas. It grows especially well in areas that have been recently disturbed, such as by construction or roadways. It often grows alongside jewelweed (Impatiens capensis), which is another common wetland plant. Jewelweed is sometimes used as a homeopathic remedy for poison ivy that is said to prevent poison ivy reactions.
Plant of the Month: Poison ivy
chase.bergeson • April 5, 2023
Toxicodendron radicans AKA Poison ivy
One of the most common plants that we’ve found at our monitoring sites is one that’s useful to know wherever you are: Poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans). Poison ivy can be hard to identify as it can look very dissimilar from plant to plant or even at different points of the same plant. It is helpful to remember the common cautionary sayings:
“Leaves of three, let it be!”
“If it’s a hairy rope, don’t be a dope!”
Toxicodendron means poison tree. You definitely don’t want to accidentally touch this plant as it gives off an oil called urushiol, which can cause itchiness and puss-filled bumps for many people. Ick! You can get the oils from the plant on your skin from any part of the plant, even in winter or if the plant is dead. Some people have more of a reaction than others to the urushiol, but a sensitivity can develop over time, so it’s best not to touch. If you develop a rash, it is not contagious, but the oils can stay on your clothes or pets for a long time, causing re-exposure to the oils.
The second part of the name, radicans, means rooting. This is useful to remember as the vine that poison ivy often grows on can become covered in tiny roots that help it cling to and climb trees. Thus, the vine has a hairy or fuzzy appearance.
The leaves of poison ivy are trifoliate, meaning you will always find 3 leaves together. The plant may have many branches, each with 3 leaves. Be careful to look at multiple parts of the plant as it is possible that damage to the plant may cause you to only see 2 leaves, but most of the plant should have groupings of 3 leaves and never more than 3 leaves. The leaves can vary significantly in shape and color. Leaves may appear green, reddish, shiny, or matte! They may appear as smooth (entire) almond shapes or may have significant toothing (lobing). Poison ivy can grow as ground cover, a bushy plant growing out of the ground, or a hairy vine growing up a tree. Poison ivy has white fruits in the fall and yellow flowers in the summer.
leaves
Photo By: Amanda Johnson
Leaves
Photo By: Jane Kirkland
Leaves
Photo By: wrudolph
Poison Ivy leaves
Photo by: Amanda Johnson
Poison ivy is not a true ivy, but it is in the same family as cashews and mangoes. If you develop a severe allergy to poison ivy, you may also be affected by these plants.
Poison ivy can be confused with a couple other common plants we might see:
Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia) also grows on a vine and can be green or reddish. It has groupings of 5 leaves, but some younger parts of the plant may have only 3 leaves. Check the whole plant and if you see leaves of 5 anywhere on the plant, it is not poison ivy.
Young box elders (Acer negundo) can also be confused for poison ivy. Box elder is a type of maple that can also have groups of 3 leaves. They grow in wet areas and although they become trees, they start out small and shrubby like poison ivy. It is helpful to look at how the leaves are arranged. Poison ivy has alternate branching, meaning that only one branch will come out of the main stem at any point. Box elders, like all maples, have opposite branching, meaning that 2 branches will depart from the main stem at any point along the stem. If the plant is damaged, there may be some points where you don’t see 2 branches, but if there is any point on the stem where 2 branches come out at the same point, it has opposite branching.
Box elder
Photo By: Nate Loper
Box elder's opposite branching
Photo By: Aliaksandar Malik
Poison ivy's alternate branching
Photo By: Colby McClain
Poison ivy gets a bad reputation, but it has benefits! Its fruits provide food for many animals and its roots help hold soil and prevent erosion, especially in disturbed areas.
On your next hike, look out for poison ivy in its many forms, so that you’ll be prepared to identify it at our next monitoring events. If you are still unsure, you can practice using
iNaturalist on your phone to help you.
You might also like
Celebrating Our Carolina Wetlands
The U.S. Congress is poised to weaken federal protection of wetlands. To understand why these changes matter, it helps to know how wetland permitting actually works. How Wetland Permitting Is Supposed to Work Whether the permit goes through the State agency (e.g. NC DEQ or SC DES which reviews water quality impacts) and/or the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) and EPA (which review the physical, chemical, and biological impacts), every application is supposed to follow a three-step mitigation sequence: avoid, minimize, and compensate. Avoid. The reviewer works with the applicant to determine whether the impact can be avoided altogether. Often, it can. Minimize. If the impact can’t be avoided, the reviewer and applicant look for ways to reduce it. Compensate. If the remaining impact is large enough, the applicant must compensate for the loss using a formula provided by the ACOE. Mitigation normally takes place in the same watershed and provides the same function as the wetland that was lost. This process takes time, but it is essential. It ensures that applicants don’t overlook options that could spare valuable wetlands. What Senate Bill 5653 Would Change Senate Bill 5653 , the Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act (BAAJA),aims to speed up federal and state regulatory decisions on housing and other development projects. But the bill would increase environmental degradation and undermine the federal-state partnerships that protect clean water. Here is the core problem: when permitting is rushed, reviewers can’t carry out the avoid, minimize, and compensate process. More wetlands will be damaged, and there will be no way to make up for the lost wetlands and the benefits they provide. A Weak Answer to the Housing Shortage BAAJA does little to address the real causes of the national housing shortage and construction challenges. Instead, it increases pollution and works against the central goal of the Clean Water Act: to restore and maintain the physical, chemical, and biological integrity of the nation’s waters, including wetlands. The bill is an assault on the nation’s rivers, wetlands, estuaries, and lakes. It also looks like a deflection from Congress’s inability to pass legislation that meaningfully tackles the lack of available housing. Undercutting State Authority Over Water Quality BAAJA also limits the authority states hold under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act, making it harder for them to meet the water quality standards they have set for their own waterbodies. That would set back five decades of progress toward cleaner water, progress to which every sector of society has contributed, and it would affect generations to come. Fewer Wetlands Protected, and Weaker Review for the Rest This is yet another attack on wetland protection, and it affects all of us. Even those wetlands that remain regulated after recent jurisdictional retreats by EPA and the ACOE would not receive the normal permitting review. In practice, that means they aren’t truly protected either. What You Can Do Contact your representative. Ask your senators to oppose Senate Bill 5653 . You can find and contact your U.S. senators here , or look up your U.S. representative here to share your concerns with the House as well. Support Carolina Wetlands Association. We are your organization fighting to protect wetlands. The next time you explore a wetland or pour a clean glass of water, consider making a donation to help us keep up this work.
A Decade of Celebrating Carolina's Wetland Treasures
On September 9, 2026, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers issued a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM) offering additional ways to define “waters of the United States” (WOTUS). Why this definition matters The WOTUS definition determines which water bodies the federal government can protect under the Clean Water Act. In November 2025, the agencies proposed revisions to bring the definition in line with the Supreme Court’s 2023 decision in Sackett v. EPA. After taking public comments, they have now put forward further options. The new proposal narrows federal jurisdiction even more, potentially stripping protections from the vast majority of U.S. wetlands and seasonal streams. What our comment letter says The Carolina Wetlands Association is submitting comments opposing the proposal. Our main concerns: It would undermine the Clean Water Act’s purpose. The law’s goal is to restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the nation’s waters. This proposal would severely undercut that goal. The “days of water” test is a poor measure. The proposal decides jurisdiction by how many days a year water is present. That number correlates poorly with a waterway’s ability to carry pollution downstream to the rivers, lakes, and estuaries that would stay protected. Streams dry for as few as 30 days a year could lose protection, and polluters would have an incentive to discharge into them rather than into protected waters. Drinking water is at risk. About 56% of North Carolina’s stream miles feeding public drinking water systems are intermittent, ephemeral, or headwater streams. In South Carolina the figure is 51%. These systems serve 6.6 million people, who would bear higher health risks and treatment costs. Wetlands do critical work. They filter pollutants and nutrients that cause algal blooms, dead zones, and fish kills. Losing that function would also degrade groundwater, which many people drink untreated. The legal reasoning is flawed. We argue the agencies misread the Supreme Court’s language. “Relatively permanent” describes geographic features such as streams with defined beds and banks. The word “continuously” modifies “flowing” and doesn’t limit what counts as relatively permanent. It would be hard to implement. Many affected streams have no data showing how many days they lack surface water. That makes the rule difficult for agencies to administer and leaves landowners unable to tell whether the Clean Water Act applies to their property. The impacts haven’t been analyzed. The agencies should not finalize a rule before measuring the added pollution flowing from newly unprotected waters into those that supply drinking water, or projecting the resulting damage to downstream uses. What you can do Read the SNPRM Submit your comment by October 9, 2026, under Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OW-2025-0322 . Personal stories about the streams, wetlands, and drinking water you depend on are especially effective. Learn more: read the comments we submitted on the November 2025 version of the rule, many of which still apply.